A DIVORCE MAY START WITH AN ARGUMENT BUT DOES IT HAVE TO END THAT WAY?

Dispute Resolution (DR) week….hmmmm.

DR week is  an awareness-raising week which aims to highlight the alternatives to court for separating couples and their families http://www.resolution.org.uk/DisputeResolutionWeek2014/

Firstly, for the avoidance of doubt, I absolutely encourage people to seek to resolve matters in a dignified and cost effective way. I think this is a really good initiative. I am also a member of Resolution (an organisation of family lawyers who subscribe to a code of practice to resolve matters in a non-confrontational way) and I sit on one of the committees. I also believe all cases should be approached in this manner.

I am interested, however, to know exactly the extent of the impact of DR week on people presently going through the court process. It is a bit like pancake day- you eat them for one day - but will you eat pancakes all year round?

The reality is that any family solicitor worth their salt will explore methods of dispute resolution with a client. This is my issue with the requirement to attend mediation. From April 2014, unless in exceptional circumstances, you cannot make an application to the family court without first attending a Mediation Information & Assessment Meeting (otherwise known as a MIAM). Most family solicitors were already advising clients of these options before the new requirements were introduced.

Often it is actually more cost effective and indeed resolution focused to invoke a court timetable against an agreement in principle to enter into early settlement discussions. That may sound counter-intuitive but when there is perhaps an agreement between Husband and Wife to avoid court proceedings by negotiating through solicitors the pre requisite to that process will be providing ‘voluntary disclosure’. That process can often take as long, cost as much money and become immensely frustrating without a proper timetable in place.  You can therefore end up in a situation where a desire to avoid court proceedings actually has the completely opposite effect.

It is important to talk through all of the options at the very start of case. Getting a ‘feel’ for the case really can be as important as the legal aspects to make sure the process of resolving money issues does not become unnecessarily unpleasant.

If you would like to have a no obligation discussion about your options please do not hesitate to get in touch on 0121 203 5309.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ASIAN DIVORCE: 5 TOP TIPS ON JEWELLERY (BY MARK HANDS)

Image
It is perhaps of no surprise that the English courts have seen a massive rise in cases concerning dowry issues and, in particular, jewellery exchanged on marriage. The whereabouts of jewellery, its origins, its value and whether it has been unlawfully retained by one spouse are just some of the issues the court will need to tackle at an early stage. Gold jewellery is often a source of dispute on divorce
Read more

Finding Hidden Assets on Divorce: The Elusive Gold Pot at the End of the Rainbow

Image
There are various versions of the myth about gold and rainbows. Perhaps the most ancient version goes that fairies with great wealth buried their treasures and gold at the end of the rainbow, guarded by Leprechauns. Any experienced family lawyer, therefore, has to be on alert to the fact that the colour of one’s disclosure might in fact be caused by reflection, refraction and dispersion of light.
Read more

FIXED FEE FUTURE FOR DIVORCE??

Image
For some time now I have advocated the need for the profession to implement a more flexible and modern way of charging legal fees. There is a growing dissatisfaction amongst the public with the traditional way of structuring legal costs. Clients, understandably in my view, are craving more certainty with what a divorce is going to cost. The problem exists in the very nature of the proceedings. Decisions made in divorce and family law cases are often shrouded by emotion. A difficult opponent, intent on making sure his or her spouse does not receive a fair share of the assets, does nothing to dilute this toxic mix. Throw in expert fees and suddenly you have a recipe for growing costs. Against this background it remains very difficult for a family lawyer to provide a truly accurate estimate at the outset. Indeed, and this is one of my ‘pet hates’, a sharp practice has developed amongst some firms who will underestimate at the outset to secure the instructions of the client only for...
Read more